Legal Opinion

Rodina v. Castaneda

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided July 16, 2021No. 123313PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

No. 123,313 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS CURTIS RODINA, Appellant, v. ALBERTO R. CASTANEDA, D.D.S., Appellee. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. A plaintiff may pursue separate actions against tortfeasors when there has been no trial and judicial determination of comparative fault. Once a plaintiff proceeds to trial and comparative fault is judicially determined, the plaintiff can no longer pursue other suits for damages arising out of the same occurrence. 2. When the trial court entered default judgment in a separate action against other tortfeasors, it made no apportionment of fault…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. City of SawyerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  2. Albertson v. Volkswagenwerk AktiengesellschaftSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981
  3. Anderson v. SchefflerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1988
  4. Eurich v. AlkireSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  5. Ellis v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Great Plains Roofing and Sheet Metal, Inc. v. K Building Specialties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API