Beechwood Acres, Inc. v. Town of Hamilton
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtCutter, J.
The petitioner (Beechwood) seeks under Gr. L. c. 185, § 1 (ji/2), and c. 240, § 14A (inserted, respectively, by St. 1934, c. 263, §§ 1 and 2), to obtain a declaration that Hamilton’s zoning by-law was unconstitutionally vague as it applied to Beechwood’s land (the locus) east of Main Street (apparently sometimes called Bay Road) near its junction with Rock Maple Avenue. The by-law incorporated by reference a zoning map, but neither the by-law nor the map set out the zone boundaries by courses or distances except as these could be determined from the map.
The boundary between a residence A…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Wellesley College v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Harrington v. AndersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Aronson v. Town of SharonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
- Pitman v. City of MedfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- Kershaw v. ZecchiniMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- LeMaster v. Amsted Industries, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1982
- Parmenter v. Board of AppealsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
- Jenkins v. Town of PepperellMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1984
- Devine v. Town of SaugusMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1977