Legal Opinion
City of Atlanta v. Minder
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided February 9, 1951No. 33351PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFelton, J.
Defendant in error contends that the petition is not subject to the special demurrer in that the pleading therein is not duplicitous because there is set forth only one ultimate fact situation and not inconsistent or alternative fact situations, and in that one fact situation may result in more than one legal result and may be called by different legal names and may fit into different legal pigeon-holes or doctrines in the law and that the allegation of these legal results from one and only one fact situation does not make three causes of action. We disagree with the contention of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kea v. City of DublinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
- Smith v. Floyd CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
- City of Albany v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Hartley v. HartleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Glynn Lumber Co. v. McCannSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Willis v. HillCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- City of Thomson v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
- Johnson v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
- Atlanta Stove Works, Inc. v. HollonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- McEntyre v. ClackCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.