Legal Opinion

Smith v. Floyd County

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 5, 1927No. 17168PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

1. The test of the sufficiency of a petition as against a general demurrer is whether the defendant can admit all the allegations made therein and escape liability. If the petition in the instant case sets forth a cause of action either for the recovery of damages as for the maintenance of a nuisance, or for a recovery under that provision of the constitution which declares that private property shall not be taken or damaged for public purposes without just and adequate compensation first being paid, it will withstand a general demurrer and it will not be the duty of this court, in passing…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Smith v. Floyd CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
  2. Citizens & Southern Bank v. Union Warehouse & Compress Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  3. Scearce v. Mayor of GainesyilleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  4. Sheppard v. Georgia Railway & Power Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  5. Nalley v. Carroll CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1911

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Gilson v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  2. Davis v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  3. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. StricklandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
  4. Bibb County v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  5. James v. Dayton Rubber Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1938

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API