Legal Opinion

Regents of University of California v. City & County of San Francisco

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 22, 2004No. A101716PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MARCHIANO, P. J.

The Regents of the University of California (Regents) sued the City and County of San Francisco (City) for refund of allegedly excessive water and sewer charges. The trial court granted the City’s motion for summary judgment on the ground that the Regents’ action was time-barred by the 120-day limitations period of Government Code section 66022. The Regents contend the trial court erred by ruling the limitations period was triggered by the City’s 1996 resolutions increasing the water and sewer rates, and not by the City’s 1999 annual budget resolution. We disagree and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Buss v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. San Marcos Water District v. San Marcos Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Utility Cost Management v. Indian Wells Valley Water DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Trend Homes, Inc. v. Central Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  5. San Marcos Water District v. San Marcos Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Regents of University of California v. East Bay Municipal Utility DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  2. Campana v. East Bay Mun. Utility Dist.California Court of Appeal · 2023
  3. Campana v. East Bay Mun. Utility Dist.California Court of Appeal · 2023
  4. Dept. of Finance v. Com. on State MandatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
  5. Hiller v. Marin Municipal Water Dist.California Court of Appeal · 2026

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API