Legal Opinion

Hunt v. United States Steel Corporation

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 10, 1963No. 6 Div. 797PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAWSON, Justice.

This is a Workmen’s Compensation Case wherein the sole question for decision is whether death benefits must be paid on behalf of the illegitimate children of a male employee.

That question was answered in the negative by the trial court. We agree.

In Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. Watford, 245 Ala. 425, 17 So.2d 166, the trial court awarded compensation to the “widow” of the deceased workman for herself and for the seven children of the “marriage.” On appeal to this court we held that the woman involved was not ill fact the widow of the deceased workman. We reversed the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. WatfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  2. Murrell v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Portin v. PortinTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Ex Parte ShawSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  5. Bell v. Tennessee Coal, Iron R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1941

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Talley v. a & M CONSTRUCTION COMPANYSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
  2. Browning v. City of HuntsvilleCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1971
  3. Foy v. VannCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1979
  4. Everage v. GibsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  5. Everage v. GibsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API