Legal Opinion

Portin v. Portin

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1923PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Green

The only question involved upon the appeal in these causes is whether the illegitimate child of a deceased employee, said child having been supported by the employee, is a dependent and entitled to compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, chapter 123 of the Acts of 1919.

The case was submitted upon a stipulation of facts from which we quote as follows:

“It is agreed by counsel, that the record in the above cause establishes the following facts: (1) That Mercy Annie Lane, widow of Isaac Lane, was married to H. H. Comstock in Nashville, by Judge Litton Hickman, on December 2, 1918. (2)…

2Cited by28 opinions

  1. Frost v. Blue Ridge Timber Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Kinnard v. Tennessee Chemical Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Cherokee Brick Co. v. BishopTennessee Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Curtis v. Hamilton Block CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Green v. BurchSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API