In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Zafiratos
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
PEE CUEIAM.
This is a disciplinary proceeding initiated by the Oregon State Bar. The lawyer involved practices law in the city of Astoria and was the part-time municipal judge.
The accused lawyer does not contest the findings of guilty made by the Board of Governors in three of the charges.
In the first charge the facts were that a couple came to the accused wanting a divorce. They had worked out the terms of a property settlement and there was to be no contest. He told them he could not represent both and undertook to represent the husband as plaintiff. At this same conference the wife said she…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HedrickOregon Supreme Court · 1971
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. LowensteinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BrandsnessOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- Complaint to the HershbergerOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of PiperOregon Supreme Court · 1975
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of RobertsonOregon Supreme Court · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.