Legal Opinion

Finnerty v. Wallen

District Court, N.D. California

Decided May 11, 1948No. 27192PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROCHE, District Judge.

This is a suit brought by an inventor claiming infringement of his patented device, an emery wheel dresser, with a prayer for an injunction against further infringement and an accounting during the period of the license granted to defendant and from the date of the granting of the patent. Defendant answers that the patent granted is not a valid one and that there is no infringement and prays that the cause of action for an accounting during the period of the license be dismissed.

In January, 1944, plaintiff applied for a patent, which was granted on Februray 11, 1947. On…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hurn v. OurslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Tilghman v. ProctorSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. Cantrell v. WallickSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Morley Sewing MacHine Co. v. LancasterSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  5. Hobbs v. BeachSupreme Court of the United States · 1901

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Martin Stamping & Stove Co. v. ManleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  2. Webster v. Speed Corp.District Court, D. Oregon · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API