Legal Opinion

Cloud v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 21, 1996No. B100927PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

EPSTEIN, J.

This is a discovery dispute in the context of a claim of gender-based discrimination. The petitioner, plaintiff in the trial court proceedings, served a demand for production pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 2031. In it, she sought discovery of documents relating to the affirmative action plans of real party in interest Litton Industries, Inc. (Litton), one of the defendants below. Litton objected to discovery about its affirmative action plans. Among other things, it claimed that some of the documents were protected by the “self-critical analysis privilege.”…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Jaffee v. RedmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. University of Pennsylvania v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Lowe v. City of MonroviaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  4. Coates v. Johnson & JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  5. Bredice v. Doctors Hospital, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1970

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Brent MowerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  2. Marylander v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  3. Scottsdale Ins. Co. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  4. American Airlines, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  5. Zoom Imaging, L.P. v. St. Luke's Hospital & Health NetworkDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API