Marylander v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
VOGEL (C. S.), P. J.
Introduction
A defendant in pending civil litigation seeks to compel discovery from a state agency of records that are relevant to his defense in the underlying case. The records are memoranda from the state agency to the Governor’s Office. The trial court denied a motion to compel production, agreeing with the state agency that such memoranda are absolutely privileged on the grounds that correspondence to the Governor is exempt from disclosure as a public record, and a common law “deliberative process” privilege absolutely protects such interoffice communications in…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Pitchess v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Roberts v. City of PalmdaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Valley Bank of Nevada v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Times Mirror Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Fortunato v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Department of Motor Vehicles v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Los Angeles Unified School District v. Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension PlanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Commission on Judicial Performance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.