Legal Opinion
Scottsdale Ins. Co. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 18, 1997No. B114112PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HASTINGS, J.
Plaintiff and petitioner, Scottsdale Insurance Company (Scottsdale), challenges an order compelling it to produce documents which it asserts fall within the attorney-client privilege. Directly at issue in this proceeding is application of subdivisions (f) and (k) of Code of Civil Procedure section 2031, 1 part of the Civil Discovery Act of 1986 (§ 2016 et seq.). As pertinent, these sections state:
“(f) The party to whom an inspection demand has been directed shall respond separately to each item or category of item by a statement that the party will comply with the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Coy v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Superior Court of L.A. Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- Zellerino v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- City of Fresno v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hernandez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Sinaiko Healthcare Consulting, Inc. v. Pacific Healthcare ConsultantsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- City of Los Angeles v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Deary v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Hernandez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.