Legal Opinion
Stoll, Exr. v. Rich, Exr.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided February 23, 1929No. 13,314PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNichols, J.
Action by Rich and Pyle for their fees as attorneys for the executors of the estate of John B. Stoll, deceased, in the sum of $2,000.
It appears by their petition filed with the court that they were partners engaged in the practice of law in the city of South Bend, Indiana, under the firm name of "Rich and Pyle”; that on April 12, 1926, they were employed by appellants, executors of the will of their father, John B. Stoll, to furnish legal assistance and advice in the administration of said estate^ Appellants were appointed executors of said will about said time, and have ever since acted in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. WoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- DeHaven v. DeHavenIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Vogel v. HarrisIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Henderson v. HendersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
- Conway v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1912
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Johnson v. REEVES, JUDGE, ETC.Indiana Supreme Court · 1955
- WATSON ETC. v. Dept. of Public WelfareIndiana Court of Appeals · 1960
- Guardianship of Carrico v. BennettIndiana Court of Appeals · 1974
- Bohannan v. BohannanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1960
- Bohannan v. BohannanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.