Legal Opinion

Borkowski v. Borkowski

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 6, 1976PublishedCited by 111 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum. Order. of the Appellate Division affirmed, without costs.

It is not essential, as the Appellate Division stated, that punitive damages be allowed in a fraud case only where the acts had been aimed at the public generally. Nevertheless, the proof in this case does not establish such gross, wanton, or willful fraud or other morally culpable conduct to a degree sufficient to justify an award of punitive damages. At least the Appellate Division was entitled to so conclude. (See, generally, Walker v Sheldon, 10 NY2d 401, 404-405.)

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Walker v. SheldonNew York Court of Appeals · 1961

3Cited by111 opinions

  1. Action S.A. And Deltamar Establishment v. Marc Rich & Co., Inc. And Marc Rich, Marc RichCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  2. Texaco, Inc. v. Pennzoil, Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1987
  3. Marine Midland Bank v. MurkoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  4. Savino v. EF Hutton & Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1981
  5. Roy Export Company Establishment Of Vaduz, Liechtenstein v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982

106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API