Legal Opinion

Grynberg v. BP PLC

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided November 12, 2008No. 1:08-mj-00301PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JOHN D. BATES, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Jack J. Grynberg, Grynberg Production Corporation (TX), Grynberg Production Corporation (CO), and Pricaspian Development Corporation (TX) (collectively, “plaintiffs” or “Grynberg”) sued several oil companies and their executives alleging violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. § 1962, and various state laws. See Complaint (“Compl.”) at ¶¶ 57-86. Before the Court are three motions filed by the various defendants to dismiss the complaint. BP P.L.C. (“BP”) filed a motion to compel…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Haire v. Smith, Currie & Hancock LLPDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  2. Oehme, Van Sweden & Associates, Inc. v. Maypaul Trading & Services Ltd.District Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  3. Sakyi v. Estée Lauder Cos.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  4. Mercadante v. Xe Services, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  5. W & T Travel Services, LLC v. Priority One Services, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2014

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API