Legal Opinion

Graham v. Special Commissioners of Suffolk

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 8, 1940PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtField, C.J.

These are eight petitions for writs of mandamus brought against the board of special commissioners appointed under the provisions of St. 1939, c. 467, § 2, to divide Suffolk County into representative districts, and to assign representatives thereto. In each case the respondent commissioners filed an answer and the petitioner filed a replication thereto. The Secretary of the Commonwealth is referred to in each of the petitions as a respondent. And he has answered admitting the facts alleged in the petitions, alleging that his duty in the premises is purely administrative, and submitting…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Attorney General v. Suffolk County Apportionment CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  2. McGlue v. County CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  3. Donovan v. Suffolk County Apportionment CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  4. Brophy v. Suffolk County Apportionment CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  5. Faulkner v. Lowell Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Moore v. Election CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  2. Kaplan v. BowkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
  3. Preisler v. DohertySupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  4. Lamson v. Secretary of the CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960
  5. Vigneault v. Secretary of the CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API