Legal Opinion

First Nat. Bank of Omaha v. State

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1988No. 87-027PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Colwell, D. J., Retired.

Plaintiff’s appeal involves a claim made under the State Tort Claims Act, Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 81-8,209 etseq. (Reissue 1987). Plaintiff, First National Bank of Omaha (FNB), claims damage when it acquired a bank and a savings company as suggested and approved by the State of Nebraska (State) acting by and through the director of the Department of Banking and Finance (Department). The two institutions later became insolvent. The State’s demurrer to the petition was sustained, and the trial court ordered the petition dismissed without leave to amend.

On April 8, 1985, FNB…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. NeustadtSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Block v. NealSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Rosnick v. MarksNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Maple v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Koepf v. County of YorkNebraska Supreme Court · 1977

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Hoiengs v. County of AdamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Millman v. County of ButlerNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Hamilton v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Schmidt v. Omaha Public Power DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  5. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Touche Ross & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1990

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API