Legal Opinion
Forbes v. Ballaro
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 4, 1993No. 11176PublishedCited by 87 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.
The plaintiffs, Neil Forbes and Marilyn Forbes, appeal from a judgment of the trial court granting a motion to strike filed by the defendants,1 the city of Shelton, Frank Kullberg and John Cook.2 On appeal, the plaintiffs claim that the trial court improperly concluded that (1) their claims against the city of Shelton were time barred by the provisions of General Statutes § 7-4653 and (2) their claims against Cook and Kullberg were time barred by General Statutes §§ 52-5774 and 52-584.5
*237The facts fairly provable under the relevant counts of the complaint are as follows. The plaintiffs entered…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Vilcinskas v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- Fairfield Lease Corp. v. Romano's Auto ServiceConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
- Demartino v. SiemonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
- Nichols v. NicholsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Schenck v. PelkeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by87 opinions
- Altfeter v. Borough of NaugatuckConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Girard v. WeissConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Greco v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Doe v. Board of EducationConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Decorso v. Watchtower Bible & Tract Society of New York, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.