Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court v. Korsmo
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Per curiam
[¶ 1] John Korsmo objects to the length of suspension recommended by a hearing panel of the Disciplinary Board. The hearing panel recommended that Korsmo be suspended from the practice of law for two years from the time he seeks relicensure. We adopt the hearing panel’s recommendations that Korsmo be suspended and that he pay the costs and expenses associated with the disciplinary proceeding. We reject the hearing panel’s *7recommendation on the time period for suspension. We order Korsmo be precluded from applying to practice law in this State until July 1, 2007, and we order him to pay costs…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kaiser v. KaiserNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- Hunt Trust Estate v. KikerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
- Matter of Disciplinary Action Against NassifNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State v. WardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. KaiserNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against KorsmoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Disciplinary Bd. of the Supreme Court v. Varriano (In re Varriano )North Dakota Supreme Court · 2018