Legal Opinion

Francez v. Francez

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided October 30, 1922No. 25284PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSt. Paul, J.

Plaintiffs brought this suit to revoke the usufruct which their father enjoys in their undivided half of certain prop erty owned in common with him, on the ground of waste and failure to make necessary repairs.

The district court rejected their demand, but the Court of Appeal reversed the judg*667roent and decreed plaintiffs entitled to reenter and take possession of the property upon their paying defendant $100 cash, and $100 per annum during his lifetime.

Plaintiffs now apply to this court to set aside so much of the judgment of the Court of Appeal as condemns them to pay. the aforesaid annuity…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hall v. GodchauxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1921
  2. Hart v. PicouSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
  3. Payne v. GentrySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1921
  4. Bartmess v. HendricksSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  5. State ex rel. Futch v. RockettSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. National Pumps Corporation v. BruningLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1941
  2. Martinez v. Orleans Parish School BoardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
  3. Baumgarden v. AikenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
  4. Penneywell v. Clark-Dunbar, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API