Legal Opinion

Shell Oil Co. v. District Court

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 26, 1934No. 7412PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WILBUR, Circuit Judges

The petitioner, first having obtained leave of court so to do, filed a petition for an alternative writ of mandate or prohibition. The order to show cause was issued, and the respondents filed a return objecting, among other things, to the jurisdiction of this court to issue a writ of mandamus or prohibition in the matter. The respondents, upon the application of the complainant in the case of West Coast Petroleum Corporation v. Shell Oil Company, and others, now pending in the District Court of the United States' for the Western District of Washington, issued a subpmna…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McClellan v. CarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Maryland v. Soper, JudgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Ex Parte United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Ex Parte HardingSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. Barber Asphalt Pav. Co. v. MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dooley Improvements, Inc. v. NieldsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API