Legal Opinion

In re Secord

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided March 9, 1923No. 6621PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNeterer, District Judge

(after stating the facts as above). The issue is covered by sections 60d and 64b of the Bankruptcy Act (Comp. St. §§ 9644, 9648), which are construed in pari materia. The one requires the court to examine the reasonableness of the attorney fee when it is paid in advance; the other limits the payment to a reasonable fee while performing the duties prescribed by the Bankruptcy Act. The services contemplated are the preparation of the necessary legal papers to procure the adjudication and references, and bring the debtor before the referee for such subsequent proceedings as may be required, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re KrossDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1899
  2. In re HabeggerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
  3. In re ChristiansonDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1910
  4. In re Duran Mercantile Co.District Court, D. New Mexico · 1912

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Conrad, Rubin & Lesser v. PenderSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. In Re Owl Drug Co.District Court, D. Nevada · 1936
  3. In Re RothmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
  4. In Re Klein-Moffett Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1928
  5. In re Evenod Perfumer, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API