Legal Opinion

In Re Owl Drug Co.

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided August 7, 1936No. 480PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YANKWICH, District Judge.

As a part of the proceedings for the final distribution of this estate, there are before the court petitions for the allowance of additional fees for the trustee’s attorneys and of fees for the bankrupt’s attorney, and the approval of the referee’s account.

The attorneys for a few of the smaller creditors have filed a formal objection to the allowance to the trustee’s attorneys of a fee in excess of $32,500, and of a fee in excess of $7,500 to the bankrupt’s attorney. Other small creditors have expressed their disapproval in letters to the referee and to the clerk of…

2Cases cited66 opinions

  1. Randolph v. ScruggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Weil v. NearySupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  3. In Re Wood and HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. Manhattan Properties, Inc. v. Irving Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. Harrison v. PereaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. In Re Jensen-Farley Pictures, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 1985
  2. In Re S.T.N. Enterprises, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · 1987
  3. Matter of Hamilton Hardware Co., Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1981
  4. In the Matter of Pacific Far East Line, Inc., Debtor. Joseph M. Alioto v. Official Creditor CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  5. In Re Willamette Timber Systems, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 1985

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API