Legal Opinion
Sternau v. Sternau
New York Family Court
Decided February 3, 1947PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtSicher, J.
Upon the facts hereinafter set forth, this proceeding is hereby marked ‘1 Reserved Generally ’ ’ pursuant to Family Court Rule XXIV, viz.:
*857“ (a) There may be marked 1 Reserved Generally ’ any proceeding in which: * * * (2) As the result of petitioner’s * * ° action (including recourse to the Supreme Court of the State of New York ov other forum of competent jurisdiction), it appears to the Court that petitioner is no longer interested in the proceeding or entitled to continue it; * * * (b) Each proceeding within any foregoing category may be marked ‘ Reserved Generally ’ with the intent that…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Loomis v. LoomisNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Garlock v. GarlockNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Harding v. . HardingNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Harding v. HardingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- " Johnston " v. " Johnston "New York Family Court · 1941
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Doe v. DoeNew York City Family Court · 1966