Legal Opinion

Doe v. Doe

New York City Family Court

Decided May 17, 1966PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFelipe N. Torres, J.

This is an application made by the petitioner to enforce an order of support and to compel respondent to pay arrears. At the hearing petitioner and respondent appeared in person and by their attorneys.

The following facts were established at the hearing: Petitioner bad an order of support in the Family Court on the 10th day of January, 1966, which directed the respondent to pay to petitioner the sum of $60 per week for her support. No child is involved in this case. Subsequent to the entry of such order of support the respondent brought an action of separation in the Supreme Court, New York…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Varney v. VarneyNew York Family Court · 1942
  2. Bergen v. BergenNew York Family Court · 1945
  3. Sternau v. SternauNew York Family Court · 1947

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Medici v. MediciNew York City Family Court · 1967
  2. McDonald v. McDonaldNew York City Family Court · 1973
  3. Hughes v. HughesNew York City Family Court · 1968
  4. Lopez v. LopezNew York City Family Court · 1970
  5. Santamaria v. SantamariaNew York Supreme Court · 1973

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API