Legal Opinion
Max Holtzman, Inc. v. K & T CO., INC.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided June 27, 1977No. 9803, 9864PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GALLAGHER, Associate Judge:
This is a consolidated appeal by Continental Casualty Co. (Continental), a general liability and casualty insurance carrier, and its general agent, Max Holtzman, Inc. (Holtzman) from a judgment in favor of K & T Co., a retailer and the plaintiff below. The issues on appeal are essentially whether (1) the trial court erred in awarding damages to K & T when the insurance policy held by K & T excluded the items for which recovery was awarded, and (2) whether the general agent Holtzman is liable for damages to Continental if Continental is required to pay K & T.
In July…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Keiser v. WalshCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- Artmar, Inc. v. United Fire & Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Lee Washington, Inc. v. Washington Motor Truck Transportation Employees Health & Welfare TrustDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1973
- Norby v. Bankers Life Co. of Des Moines, IowaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Hopkins v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1970
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Sere v. Group Hospitalization, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- Gay Rights Coalition of Georgetown University Law Center v. Georgetown UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Flack v. LasterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- Henderson v. Snider Bros., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
- Redmond v. State Farm InsuranceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.