In re MH 2007-000629
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
IRVINE, Judge.
¶ 1 Nancy M. appeals the superior court’s order finding her persistently or acutely disabled due to a mental disorder and ordering her to undergo a combined program of inpatient and outpatient treatment. She argues she was involuntarily removed from her involuntary treatment hearing without receiving a warning that her disruptive behavior *290could lead to her removal. We hold that a court may remove a patient from a commitment hearing due to the patient’s disruptive behavior caused by medical reasons and it is within the court’s discretion to determine the form of the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Parham v. J. R.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- People v. Barbara H.Illinois Supreme Court · 1998
- Doremus v. FarrellDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1975
- Suzuki v. QuisenberryDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1976
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re Mh2010-002637Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- In Re Mh Xxxx-XxxxxxCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- In Re: Mh2020-001729Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2020