Legal Opinion

In re MH 2007-000629

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 3, 2008No. 1 CA-MH 07-0010PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

IRVINE, Judge.

¶ 1 Nancy M. appeals the superior court’s order finding her persistently or acutely disabled due to a mental disorder and ordering her to undergo a combined program of inpatient and outpatient treatment. She argues she was involuntarily removed from her involuntary treatment hearing without receiving a warning that her disruptive behavior *290could lead to her removal. We hold that a court may remove a patient from a commitment hearing due to the patient’s disruptive behavior caused by medical reasons and it is within the court’s discretion to determine the form of the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Parham v. J. R.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. People v. Barbara H.Illinois Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Doremus v. FarrellDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1975
  5. Suzuki v. QuisenberryDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1976

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Mh2010-002637Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  2. In Re Mh Xxxx-XxxxxxCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  3. In Re: Mh2020-001729Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API