Legal Opinion

Jackson Jordan, Inc. v. Leydig, Voit & Mayer

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 29, 1990No. 1-89-0840PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hartman

The issue raised in this case is whether a plaintiff, who charges defendant law firm with legal malpractice in having given it an allegedly negligent legal opinion some 15 years before suit was filed, is barred as a matter of law by the statute of limitations from litigating its grievance. Plaintiff appeals from the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment for defendant to that effect.

Plaintiff, Jackson Jordan, Inc. (Jackson), an Illinois corporation located in Schaumburg, owns a manufacturing plant in Michigan, which produces and sells heavy duty railroad equipment, including a truss-tie…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Knox College v. Celotex Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Nolan v. Johns-Manville AsbestosIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Witherell v. WeimerIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Ritter v. RitterIllinois Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Addison v. WhittenbergIllinois Supreme Court · 1988

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Jackson Jordan, Inc. v. Leydig, Voit & MayerIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Belden v. EmmermanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  3. GJ Leasing Co., Inc. v. Union Elec. Co.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 1994
  4. Union Planters Bank, N.A. v. Thompson Coburn LLPAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  5. Kramer v. Weedhopper of Utah, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1990

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API