Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Spalding
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided July 2, 2002No. 26648PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHROEDER, Justice.
Richard Anderson (Anderson) brought a civil rights claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and a state-law defamation claim against James Spalding (Spalding), Director of IDOC. The claim related to Spalding’s decision to terminate Anderson from employment with the Idaho Department of Correction. The district court granted Spalding’s motion for summary judgment. Anderson appealed.
I
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
In 1994 Anderson was a classified employee of the Idaho Department of Correction (IDOC), holding the position of manager of the Receiving and Diagnostic Unit (RDU). The RDU…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Cantwell v. City of BoiseIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
- Terrazas v. BLAINE COUNTY EX REL. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERSIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
- Sadid v. VailasDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2013
- City of Coeur D'Alene v. SimpsonIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
- Summers v. City of McCallDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2015
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.