Wright v. Seeley
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne. (Brevoort, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
This action was brought upon the common *492counts in assumpsit, and, on a trial, verdict was rendered in favor of plaintiff. The verdict is in form as follows:
“They say upon their oath that the said defendant did. undertake and promise in manner and form as charged in plaintiff’s declaration, and they assess the damages of the said plaintiff, over and above his costs and charges, at the sum of $204 and interest.”
This entry of verdict was made June '9, 1892. On July 7, 1892, judgment was entered on the verdict for damages $204, “and interest computed at the sum of $94.78,” making a total, as…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Parker v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Bell v. ArdisMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
3Cited by1 opinion
- Gordon Sel-Way, Inc. v. Spence Bros.Michigan Supreme Court · 1991