Parker v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Monroe. (Kinne, J.) Case. Defendant brings error. Tbe facts are stated in tbe opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, C. J.
Plaintiff’s colt was killed at a highway crossing. The highway runs north and south. The railroad right of way is south-southwest. Defendant’s right of way adjoins that of the Michigan Central. The-sketch on following page will aid in a description of the-, situation.
The train was bound south-west, and the colt was killed at the cattle-guard. The guard is distant from the line of the highway 35 feet, measuring on the westerly rail, and 27 feet, measuring on the easterly rail.
The statute1 provides that every railroad company shall provide its right of way fences with—
“ Suitable connecting…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Robinson v. Flint & Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Holden v. Rutland & Burlington RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1858
- Jeffersonville, Madison, & Indianapolis Railroad v. MorganIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
- Towne v. Nashua & Lowell RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
- Mumpower v. Hannibal & St. Joseph Rail RoadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
3Cited by7 opinions
- Minot v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Fiore v. LaddOregon Supreme Court · 1896
- Hohl v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Printing Industry v. BanksOregon Supreme Court · 1935
- First National Bank of Waubay v. HeroldSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.