Legal Opinion
Gordon v. E.L. Hamm & Associates, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided December 4, 1996No. 95-3077PublishedCited by 133 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VINING, Senior District Judge:
I. INTRODUCTION
In this appeal, we review the district court’s denial of the defendant’s renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law on the plaintiff’s claim under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq., on which the jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff. The district court concluded that the evidence adduced at trial supported the jury’s finding that the plaintiff was a “qualified individual with a disability” under the ADA We REVERSE the judgment of the district court and REMAND the matter to the district court and direct…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- School Bd. of Nassau Cty. v. ArlineSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Donald C. Hedberg v. Indiana Bell Telephone Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Lori L. Vande Zande v. State of Wisconsin Department of Administration, James R. Klauser, Lee MartinsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Hubert Wooten v. Farmland FoodsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Dutcher v. Ingalls ShipbuildingCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by133 opinions
- Lea Cordoba v. Dillard's Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- Hilburn v. Murata Electronics North America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- MAC ARTHUR KAMMUELLER, — v. LOOMIS, FARGO & CO., —Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- Alice T. Cleveland v. Home Shopping NetworkCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Barbara Davidson v. Midelfort Clinic, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
128 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.