Legal Opinion

People v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 29, 1995PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject defendant’s contention that the prosecutor shifted the burden of proof during his summation. The prosecutor’s comments were a proper response to defense counsel’s summation (see, People v Maisonet, 172 AD2d 274, lv denied 78 NY2d 969; People v Peralta, 172 AD2d 155, lv denied 78 NY2d 925). Any impropriety in the prosecutor’s cross-examination of defendant was not so egregious that it deprived defendant of a fair trial (see, People v Toumbis, 204 AD2d 1026; People v Dawkins, 203 AD2d 957, 958, lv denied 84 NY2d 824).

The trial court properly…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. McDanielNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. People v. BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. People v. CharlestonNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. People v. DawkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  5. People v. MagnanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. YelleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. People v. ValentineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  3. People v. HoukAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API