Legal Opinion

People v. Houk

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 8, 1996Published

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum: Defendant contends that County Court erred in permitting a prosecution witness to bolster the trial testimony of the infant complainant, whom defendant was found to have raped and sodomized. The witness testified that the complainant, her daughter, had typed a message on their home computer, which stated, "I have been sexualy [sic] abused.” Defendant failed to object to the mother’s testimony regarding the computer message, and, thus, the issue is unpreserved for appeal (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Smith, 219 AD2d 794, lv denied 86 NY2d 875), and we decline to review the issue…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re Jaclyn P.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. People v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API