Legal Opinion

Monks v. Jaxon Corp.

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided September 29, 1949No. File 72946Published

1Opinion of the CourtKing, J.

In brief the plaintiff claims that each of the two defendants was a wholesale distributor of a named cosmetic preparation; that each sold and warranted this preparation as suitable for use in the plaintiff’s beauty parlor; that the plaintiff purchased this preparation from time to time from each-defend' ant and used the same in her-business; and that it irritated her skin, thereby causing her personal injuries. She sues both ,de' fendants for damages for such personal injuries and consequen' tial losses. The claims for relief are against each defendant sep' arately and against both defendants.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Veits v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
  2. Patchin v. RowellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
  3. Patterson v. KelloggSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1885
  4. State ex rel. Hartford-Connecticut Trust Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API