Legal Opinion

United States v. Quick

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided June 10, 1986No. CM 446103PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

WOLD, Senior Judge: *

Contrary to his plea, appellant was found guilty by a general court-martial, which included officer and enlisted members, of committing lewd and lascivious acts on the body of another and of taking indecent liberties with a female under the age of sixteen. He now appeals from this conviction and argues, inter alia, that the trial judge erred in admitting into evidence certain out-of-court statements made by the victim, appellant’s five-year-old daughter, to her babysitter.

I

The incident from which this issue arises occurred late one evening when…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Dutton v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Douglas v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Delaware v. FenstererSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. LingleU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1988
  2. United States v. GrantU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1993
  3. United States v. QuickUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  4. United States v. PalaciosU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1991
  5. United States v. EvansU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API