Legal Opinion
Sarmad Syed v. M-I, LLC
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 20, 2017No. 14-17186PublishedCited by 142 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion filed on January 20, 2017 is hereby amended, and an amended opinion is filed concurrently with this order.
With that amendment, the panel has unanimously voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing. Judges Wardlaw and Owens have voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Schroeder has so recommended.
The full court has been advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc and no active judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35.
Accordingly, the petition for panel rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by142 opinions
- Groshek v. Time Warner Cable, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- Long v. Se. Pa. Transp. Auth.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- Freshta Nayab v. Capital One Bank (Usa), NaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Marshall Gross v. Citimortgage, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- Cftc v. Monex Credit Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
137 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.