Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Murray, Inc.
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
TRAUGER, District Judge.
Pending before the court is the defendant Murray, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 23), to which the plaintiff has responded (Docket No. 29). For the reasons discussed herein, the defendant’s motion will be granted in part and denied in part.
I. STATEMENT OF FACTS
Since approximately 1968, Raymond “Tommie” Waits has been employed by the defendant Murray, Inc. (“Murray”). 1 From at least 1972 until he was laid off on October 17, 1997, Waits operated a powered industrial truck, or forklift, at the defendant’s factory in Lawrenceburg, Tennessee.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hohider v. United Parcel Service, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
- Praseuth v. Newell-Rubbermaid, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2002
- Miller v. Whirlpool Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2011
- Monaco v. City of JacksonvilleDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2014
- Bates v. Dura Automotive Systems, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.