Legal Opinion

Harold Ruth v. Bituminous Casualty Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 11, 1970No. 19641PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal by the workmen’s compensation insurance carrier, Bituminous Casualty Corporation (Bituminous Casualty), from a judgment in the District Court in favor of the insured company’s injured employee, Harold Ruth, for $100,000.

In 1963 Ruth was injured in the course of his employment at the Hogart Manufacturing Co. (Hogart), while operating a press manufactured by the predecessor of the E. W. Bliss Co. (Bliss). Bituminous Casualty was the workmen’s compensation carrier of Hogart, the employer, and it paid Ruth’s claim of $14,612.38 under the Michigan Workmen’s…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Barrows v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Stoner v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Tidal Oil Co. v. FlanaganSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. Cross Lake Shooting and Fishing Club v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1912

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Richard Olsen v. Gerald T. McFaul SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  2. Clutter v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
  3. William Eastham v. Chesapeake Appalachia, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  4. The Standard Fire Insurance Co v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  5. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. HiermerDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1988

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API