Legal Opinion
Innovest, Inc. v. Bruckner
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 13, 1981No. Civ. 58247PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ASHBY, J.
Cross-complainants Innovest, Inc., and Gregory McKay appeal from an order dismissing their cross-complaint against Eric Bruckner, individually, and Eric Bruckner & Company, for failure to bring the action to trial within two years. (Code Civ. Proc., § 583, subd. (a); Cal. Rules of Court, rule 203.5.)
McKay is president of Innovest, Inc. McKay, Innovest, and others were named as defendants in a complaint brought by Pacific American Real Estate Fund 1972 (hereinafter PA72) for judicial foreclosure of a deed of trust, a deficiency judgment, and other relief. The action involved an…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Lopez v. LarsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Dunsmuir Masonic Temple v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- City of Los Angeles v. Gleneagle Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1976
- Corlett v. GordonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hurtado v. Statewide Home Loan Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
- Troupe v. CourtneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Visco v. AbattiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Cubit v. Ridgecrest Community HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- White v. Mortgage Finance Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1983