Legal Opinion
General Motors Corp. v. Halco Instruments, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided October 20, 1971No. 46219PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Eberhardt, Judge.
1. It is obvious that there is no coverage under the terms of the express warranty which was issued to the original purchaser, Mr. Ellis, and which was subsequently transferred to appellant. By its own terms it excludes coverage as to all items complained about after the vehicle was driven 12,000 miles.
2. When appellant applied for a transfer of the warranty, and subsequently received and accepted the Protect-O-Plate for use in obtaining warranty work, it became bound by the warranty terms and provisions. That it did not have or receive a copy of the warranty does not alter…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hart v. WaldoSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- International Harvester Co. of America v. DillonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Ford Motor Company v. GunnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
- Wood v. Hub Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- Algernon Blair, Inc. v. National Surety CorporationSupreme Court of Georgia · 1966
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Nobility Homes of Texas, Inc. v. ShiversTexas Supreme Court · 1977
- Beverly Cole Anita S. Perkins Jewell P. Lowe v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
- Morrow v. New Moon Homes, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1976
- Theos & Sons, Inc. v. Mack Trucks, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
- Salmon Rivers Sportsman Camps, Inc. v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1975
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.