Legal Opinion

Rousselle v. Cramer

Montana Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1923No. 4,968PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Galen

This action was instituted for the recovery of damages for the alleged trespass of the defendant in cutting and removing timber from plaintiff’s land. Recovery of $600 was sought as the value of the trees cut and removed, and $1,000 for the resulting injury to the premises. The cause was tried to a *538jury aud resulted in a general verdict in plaintiff’s favor for tbe sum of $735, upon which judgment was duly made and entered. The appeal is from the judgment and from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial.

It appears that one Wilfred G. Rousselle, on August 7, 1918, was the owner in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Dempster v. Oregon Short Line RailroadMontana Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Mattison v. ConnerlyMontana Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Murphy v. CooperMontana Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Previsich v. Butte Electric Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Harrington v. Mutual Life InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1921

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tripp v. Silver Dyke Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Hampton v. Commercial Credit Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Wagner v. DonaldMontana Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Best v. BoyerMontana Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API