Legal Opinion

Wagner v. Donald

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1923No. 5,131PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MR. COMMISSIONER BENNETT

prepared the opinion for the court.

Plaintiff, Peter Wagner, brought this action against defendant Geo. Donald and another on three promissory notes given by defendant Donald to his codefendant, S. D. Davis, and by Davis indorsed to plaintiff. Davis was not served with process and did not appear at the trial.

Defendant by way of defense relied upon a failure of consideration, contending that plaintiff was not a holder in due course. In support of this contention he introduced evidence that plaintiff and Davis brought to Columbus, Montana, a shipment of thoroughbred…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Casey v. Northern Pacific Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Escallier v. Great Northern Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1912
  3. McIntyre v. Northern Pacific Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Nord v. Boston & Montana Consolidated Copper & Silver Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Stewart v. Stone & Webster Engineering Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Maki v. Murray HospitalMontana Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Rau v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Puutio v. RomanMontana Supreme Court · 1926
  4. McGonigle v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaMontana Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Boepple v. MohaltMontana Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API