Legal Opinion

Ingram v. Blackmon

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 23, 1941No. 4-6430PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

In 1918, the city of Stuttgart, by a proceeding the validity of which is not questioned, refunded its outstanding general indebtedness, by reissuing warrants against its general revenue fund in the amount of $36,922.50. These refunding warrants were payable serially, and in annual installments, and constituted what was known as the Elkins Loan. The maturities of these refunding warrants ran from September 1, 1918, to September 1, 1935, according to the ordinance which authorized their issuance. These warrants were paid as they matured from 1918 up to and including 1924, payments being made…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fuller v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
  2. Lybrand v. Wafford (1)Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  3. Matheny v. Independence CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
  4. Avera v. BanksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
  5. Cumnock v. Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lumsden v. ErstineSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  2. Schuman v. WalthourSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942
  3. Stringer v. FultonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API