Legal Opinion

Backus v. Severn

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 1926PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGlennon, J.

This is an action for negligence. It is brought by plaintiff, a resident of the State of New York, against the defendant, a resident of the State of Connecticut. The accident occurred on the 28th day of April, 1918, near Darien, Conn. The action was not commenced until May 25, 1922, over four years after the date of the accident. The stipulated facts disclose that *777both plaintiff and defendant, at all times since April, 1918, have remained residents of their respective States. Defendant in his answer pleads that plaintiff’s action has been barred by the Statute of Limitations.

As the action…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ruggles v. KeelerNew York Supreme Court · 1808
  2. Ackerman v. . AckermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  3. Isenberg v. RainierAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
  4. Whiting v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
  5. Isenberg v. RainierAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Backus v. SevernAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
  2. In re the Estate of MorrisNew York Surrogate's Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API