Legal Opinion

State v. Knowles

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 15, 1900PublishedCited by 33 opinions

Appeal from the Criminal Court of Baltimore City, (Wright, J.)

1Opinion of the CourtPearce, J.

The appellee was indicted in the Criminal Court of Baltimore City under the Act of 1896, ch. 378, which repealed and re-enacted with amendments Art. 32 of the Code of Public General Laws of Maryland, entitled “ Dentistry.” He demurred to the indictment upon the ground that the Act is unconstitutional. The demurrer was sustained, the indictment was quashed, and the State has appealed. The Act mentioned, created a State Dental Board of Examiners consisting of six members, charged with the duty of issuing certificates to those entitled under the Act, to practice dentistry in the State. The fifth…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Dent v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. State v. BroadbeltCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1899
  4. Stearns v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1895
  5. Singer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1890

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Atlantic Cleaners & Dyers, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. State ex rel. Milwaukee Medical College v. ChittendenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Dasch v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1936
  4. State ex rel. Kellogg v. CurrensWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Whack v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API