Legal Opinion

People v. Reeder

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 23, 1976No. Crim. 8499PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PUGLIA, P. J.

Defendant appeals from the judgment entered after a jury convicted him of oral sex perversion (Pen. Code, § 288a) and forcible rape (Pen. Code, § 261, subd. 3).

On the evening of May 29, 1975, Cheryl S. was hitchhiking and accepted defendant’s offer of a ride from Grass Valley to her home in Foresthill. Shortly thereafter defendant stopped the car at the side of the road, explaining to Miss S. that he had to go to the bathroom. Defendant left the car and returned a short while later. He told Miss S. he was going to make love to her. She pulled out a pocketknife and…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. People v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. People v. MayberryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. People v. DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. People v. St. AndrewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  3. People v. HousleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. People v. ReederCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. Lhost v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API