Legal Opinion

Baltz v. Mitchell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 20, 1913No. 2879PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Brror from District Court, Rogers County; T. L. Brown„ Judge. Action by Franklin P. Mitchell against Foster Baltz. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

HARRISON, C.

This was an action by Franklin P. Mitchell against Foster Baltz, nee Stone, for possession of an allotment which had been awarded to Foster Baltz by the Commission to the Five Civilized Tribes, from whose decision Franklin P. Mitchell appealed to the Commissioner of the General Land Office, where the decision of the Commission to the Five Civilized Tribes was affirmed, and then appealed to the Secretary of the Interior, where it was again affirmed and the allotment awarded to plaintiff in error, Foster Baltz. Mitchell then brought this action in the district court of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Quinby v. ConlanSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. James v. Germania Iron Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
  3. Rector v. GibbonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Garrett v. WalcottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  5. Bell v. MitchellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Higgins v. WatersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Hill v. BurnettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API