Central Mfrs'. Mut. Ins. Co. v. Cheek

BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.

Appellee filed suit in the circuit court of Chambers County against appellant on a fire insurance policy. The pleadings were in short by consent, and the defenses, to state them briefly, were:(1) Plaintiff warranted that the hazard would not be increased by the insured and breached that warranty'by removing a substantial portion of the roof of the insured building before the fire.(2) Plaintiff breached the aforesaid warranty by tearing down one or more posts from the front porch and a hole in the roof of the insured building “about half the size of a window shade and…