Legal Opinion

Camden Fire Ins. Ass'n v. Landrum

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 11, 1934No. 5 Div. 179PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOULDIN, Justice.

The action was upon a policy of fire insurance. The property insured, as described in the policy, was a “one story frame build ing, with comp, roof, occupied by tenant as* a dwelling house.”

The policy stipulated: “This entire policy shall be void if the insured has concealed or misrepresented, in writing or otherwise, any material fact, or circumstance concerning this, insurance or the subject thereof; or if the interest of the insured in the property be jiot truly stated herein.”

Plea 1 (a) interposed by defendant was as follows: “1. (a) The defendant avers that in said…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Imperial Fire Insurance v. Coos CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Alexander v. . Germania Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1876
  3. Connecticut Fire Ins. v. BuchananCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
  4. Capital City Insurance v. Caldwell Bros.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  5. Home Ins. Co. v. CurrieCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fidelity Phenix Fire Ins. Co. of New York v. RaperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  2. Clark v. Ala. Farm Bureau Mut. Cas. Ins. Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  3. Central Mfrs'. Mut. Ins. Co. v. CheekAlabama Court of Appeals · 1944
  4. Liberty Corporate Capital Ltd. v. Club Exclusive, Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API